Your Go-to Resource for your Hobby and Passion for Learning Portuguese

What’s the Difference between “Ter” and “Haver” in Portuguese

difference between ter and haver in portuguese

If you don’t know the difference between “ter” and “haver” in Portuguese, you’ll find out about it in this article.

(Plus a bonus few people talk about by the end of the article — stay tuned!)

You may have learned the word “ter” for there is, there are. It means have (and that’s why we Brazilians say “have three people” when we learn English).

But then you may have discovered that the word “haver” also means there is/there are.

And then, you heard of yet another word – and it happens to be a cognate: “existir.”

After all, what’s the difference between those words?

Read on, and you’ll find out.

Or, if you prefer, you can listen to our podcast episode entirely in Portuguese.

Uses of the Verb Ter in Portuguese

Talking about Existence in Portuguese

You already know that we have three words for the same concept of existence in Portuguese.

You probably realized that they sometimes can be used interchangeably.

The one thing that sometimes you fail to understand (because language learning apps aren’t that great on grammar explanations) is when you should use one or the other.

The difference isn’t that big.

Let’s take a look at the sentence “there are many people in the room.”

  1. muitas pessoas na sala.
  2. Existem muitas pessoas na sala.
  3. Tem muitas pessoas na sala.

The first sentence is more formal.

Because of its confusing pronunciation (it sounds like the article “a” in Portuguese), we don’t usually resort to “há” in conversation.

As you’ll see in the next example, we can employ it in the past tense, but in the present tense we avoid it.

But in writing – especially in official situations – this is the preferred verb.

The second sentence doesn’t sound natural in conversation. The verb “existir” is overkill in that situation.

But it’s grammatically correct, and you could write a sentence like that.

Now, the third sentence is the way we would speak most commonly.

But because that’s the way people talk on the streets, grammarians and the language gatekeepers tend to frown upon its usage in writing.

However, it’s very common to see it.

Specially if you text your friends very often.

Let’s take a look at yet another example, but now using the simple past tense. The sentence is “there was a problem yesterday.”

  1. Teve um problema ontem.
  2. Houve um problema ontem.
  3. (existir isn’t common in this context)

Both sentences are common in speaking and writing. But if you’re writing a cover letter to apply for a job here in Brazil, you don’t want to use “teve” in your text.

And the funny thing here is that “houve” is quite common in speaking as well. It’s pronunciation sounds like the conjugation of the verb “ouvir” in the third person singular (ouve).

Common Mistakes Brazilians Make – But You Don’t Need to

As I already talked about in the past, we Brazilians aren’t the most avid readers. We aren’t very acquainted with our own language. And that lack of familiarity with the language births a lot of common mistakes.

Mistakes in Writing

As I said above, the pronunciation of the verb “há” (3rd person singular) sounds a lot like the article “a.”

In writing, Brazilians tend to make two kinds of mistakes.

The first one is using the article instead of the verb, resulting in sentences like:

  • Eu moro aqui a* três anos. (I’ve lived here for three years.)

Some are more self-conscious and know that there should be a diacritic there and end up writing:

  • Eu moro aqui a/à* três anos. (wrong)

I see that every day, and you’re likely to see it, too.

Mistakes in Writing and Speaking

Let’s take a look at yet another example. This time the sentence is “there have been many wars in the past.”

  1. Houve muitas guerras no passado.
  2. Teve muitas guerras no passado.
  3. Existiram muitas guerras no passado.

There is a peculiarity here with the verbs “ter” and “haver.” They are always conjugated in the third person singular – present or past or future – no matter how many things you’re talking about.

You see that the verb “existir” is conjugated in the plural.

But the two other verbs are not.

And that’s the common mistake Brazilians make. Even important people who should know better (like the former Minister of Justice) make the same mistake and write sentences like this:

  • Houveram muitos problemas no passado. (oh-so-Wrong)



I’m Sure I’ll Do It — Expressing Conviction

But there’s a little-talked-about-yet-so-common use of haver — when expressing the conviction that something will happen.

The structure is “haver de” + “infinitive”. In this case, you should conjugate it just like any other verb.

Eu Hei de + infinitive
Você / ele / ela Há de
Nós Havemos de
Vocês / eles / elas Hão de

And when used in this way, it expresses the conviction that something will happen. It also shows that you intend to do something and are sure you’ll do it.

  • Eu hei de ficar rico. I’m sure I’ll get rich.
  • Ele há de entender. I’m sure he’ll understand.
  • Nós hemos de fazer isso antes que seja tarde demais. We’ll surely do it before it’s too late.

Wrapping Up

Now you know that whenever the verbs “ter” and “haver” are used with the meaning of “existir,” they are impersonal – which means that you don’t conjugate them in the plural – and always used in the third person singular.

And now you know that the difference is a mere question of formality. But in Brazil, we are not that formal. In most situations, you can get away with using either one.

But your fear preparing for CELPE-BRAS or CAPLE – two of the most important proficiency tests of Portuguese as a foreign language – you want to get it right.

So, do you have any questions? You can get in touch with me here or head over to the grammar section for more help.

  • Okay. But what about just generally to have something? I’m a complete beginner but I speak French and Spanish, so I’m looking at this from a different perspective and just saw “ter” and “haver” listed on a verb conjugation list. I was hoping to get clarification but now it just looks like two words for things existing rather than for having something or having to do something,. . . .???

    • Okay. Never mind. I should have seen right away that it’s “tener vs haber” in Spanish so, duh. Haha. Got it. Thanks in any case! Nice website!!!!

  • >